GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R7 M370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R7 M370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R7 M370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 660M

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $130 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M370

2015

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 660M instead at 1,452 vs 1,418, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M370 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 660M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R7 M370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 660M

The GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 835 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points.

Radeon R7 M370

The Radeon R7 M370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 960 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,418 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660M scores 1,452 and the Radeon R7 M370 reaches 1,418 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M370). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 0.7373 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M370). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 960 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Radeon R7 M370
G3D Mark Score	1,452+2%	1,418
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS	0.7373 TFLOPS+1%
Boost Clock	950 MHz	960 MHz+1%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	32 KB	96 KB+200%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M370 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Radeon R7 M370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 660M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M370 carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 660M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 660M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M370.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Radeon R7 M370
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660M draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M370's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M370). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Radeon R7 M370
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	29.0+53%	18.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 M370 (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Radeon R7 M370
MSRP	—	$130
Codename	GK107	Litho
Release	March 22 2012	May 5 2015
Ranking	#774	#778

Search GeForce GTX 660M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.