GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 660M

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌316.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 12W.

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

2016

Why buy it

✅135.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 12W instead of 50W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 135.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (1,500 vs 1,452), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 660M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 660M

The GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 835 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points.

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 1 2016. It features the GCN 1.2/2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660M scores 1,452 and the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) uses GCN 1.2/2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 384 (Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 800 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
G3D Mark Score	1,452	1,500+3%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.2/2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Boost Clock	950 MHz+19%	800 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 660M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) carries 512 MB. GeForce GTX 660M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 660M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge).

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660M draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)'s 12W — a 122.6% difference. The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
TDP	50W	12W-76%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	60°C	—
Perf/Watt	29.0	125.0+331%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 660M	Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP	—	$50
Codename	GK107	Bristol Ridge
Release	March 22 2012	June 1 2016
Ranking	#774	#904

Search GeForce GTX 660M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.