GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 660M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285

2008Core: 648 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660M

2012Core: 835 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 660M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 660M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 660M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 285

2008

Why buy it

  • 87.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($359 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 308% higher power demand at 204W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 660M

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 204W, a 154W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 285 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $359 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 285 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 87.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,475 vs 1,452), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 285 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 285 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 285 vs GeForce GTX 660M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285

The GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 23 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 648 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $359.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660M

The GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 835 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 285 scores 1,475 and the GeForce GTX 660M reaches 1,452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 660M uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 285) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 660M). Raw compute: 0.7085 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 285) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 660M
G3D Mark Score
1,475+2%
1,452
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7085 TFLOPS
0.7296 TFLOPS+3%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+150%
32
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 660M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 285 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660M carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 660M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 285 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 660M.

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 660M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
2 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264 (GeForce GTX 285) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 660M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 660M
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 285 draws 204W versus the GeForce GTX 660M's 50W — a 121.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 285) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 660M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 660M
TDP
204W
50W-75%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
60°C
Perf/Watt
7.2
29.0+303%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 660M (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTX 285GeForce GTX 660M
MSRP
$359
Codename
GT200B
GK107
Release
December 23 2008
March 22 2012
Ranking
#771
#774

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.