
GeForce GTX 285

Radeon R9 M365X
GeForce GTX 285 vs Radeon R9 M365X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 285 vs Radeon R9 M365X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 285 vs Radeon R9 M365X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 285
2008Why buy it
- ✅42.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌43.6% HIGHER MSRP$359 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($359 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌172% higher power demand at 204W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M365X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 204W, a 129W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 285 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 285 vs Radeon R9 M365X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 285
The GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 23 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 648 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $359.

Radeon R9 M365X
The Radeon R9 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,482 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 285 scores 1,475 and the Radeon R9 M365X reaches 1,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 285) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M365X). Raw compute: 0.7085 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 285) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M365X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | Radeon R9 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475 | 1,482 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 640+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7085 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+67% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 285 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M365X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | Radeon R9 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 285 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M365X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M365X gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 285 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M365X.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | Radeon R9 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 285 draws 204W versus the Radeon R9 M365X's 75W — a 92.5% difference. The Radeon R9 M365X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 285) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M365X). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | Radeon R9 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 204W | 75W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 7.2 | 19.8+175% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 285 came in at $359, while the Radeon R9 M365X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M365X was 30.4% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.1 (GeForce GTX 285) vs 5.9 (Radeon R9 M365X) — the Radeon R9 M365X offers 43.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M365X (2015 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 285 | Radeon R9 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $359 | $250-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.1 | 5.9+44% |
| Codename | GT200B | Tropo |
| Release | December 23 2008 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #771 | #769 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















