GeForce GTX 285
VS
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

GeForce GTX 285 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285

2008Core: 648 MHz
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 285 is positioned at rank #255 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1765%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1696%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1676%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1673%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1670%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1660%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1639%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1633%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1618%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1614%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1594%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1591%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1562%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1561%
#240
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1946%
#255
GeForce GTX 285
MSRP: $359|Avg: $30
100%
#256
Radeon HD 7570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#257
Radeon HD 6380G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#258
Radeon HD 4550
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
97%
#259
RADEON HD7450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#260
GeForce GT 330
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
97%
#262
Radeon HD 7340G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
95%
#263
Radeon HD 8210E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#264
Radeon 535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
94%
#266
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
MSRP: $85|Avg: $15
93%
#267
GeForce GT 130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
93%
#268
Radeon M535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
91%
#269
Radeon HD 7310G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is significantly newer (2021 vs 2008). The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 285 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 285 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 285UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 285 and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285

The GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 23 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 648 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $359.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 285 scores 1,475 and the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 285 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 55 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 285) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)).

FeatureGeForce GTX 285UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G3D Mark Score
1,475
1,500+2%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 12
Process Node
55 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
240+650%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 285UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 285 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 285 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GTX 285UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 285 draws 204W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 172.6% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 285) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce GTX 285UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
TDP
204W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
550W
1W-100%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Integrated
Perf/Watt
7.2
100.0+1289%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 285 launched at $359 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.2 (GeForce GTX 285) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GTX 285UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
MSRP
$359
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
49.2
Infinity
Codename
GT200B
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
December 23 2008
May 11 2021
Ranking
#771
#709