
GeForce GTX 660M

Radeon R9 M365X
GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R9 M365X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R9 M365X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R9 M365X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 660M
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M365X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M365X
2015Why buy it
- ✅32.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 660M vs Radeon R9 M365X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 660M
The GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 835 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points.

Radeon R9 M365X
The Radeon R9 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,482 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 660M scores 1,452 and the Radeon R9 M365X reaches 1,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M365X). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M365X). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Radeon R9 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,452 | 1,482+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7296 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+62% |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz+3% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 660M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M365X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Radeon R9 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 660M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M365X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M365X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 660M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M365X.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Radeon R9 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 660M draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M365X's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 660M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M365X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Radeon R9 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.0+46% | 19.8 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R9 M365X (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660M | Radeon R9 M365X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $250 |
| Codename | GK107 | Tropo |
| Release | March 22 2012 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #774 | #769 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















