Quadro 4000 vs Radeon R9 M365X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon R9 M365X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon R9 M365X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 4000

2010

Why buy it

✅56.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
379.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,199 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌89.3% higher power demand at 142W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M365X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $949 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 381.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.9 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 142W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 56.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M365X instead at 1,482 vs 1,475, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M365X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $949 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $1,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 381.9% (5.9 vs 1.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M365X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 4000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon R9 M365X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 4000

The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Radeon R9 M365X

The Radeon R9 M365X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,482 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the Radeon R9 M365X reaches 1,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M365X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M365X). Raw compute: 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M365X).

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon R9 M365X
G3D Mark Score	1,475	1,482
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	256	640+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4864 TFLOPS	1.184 TFLOPS+143%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	512 KB+220%	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon R9 M365X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M365X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M365X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M365X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 4000) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M365X) — the Quadro 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon R9 M365X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the Radeon R9 M365X's 75W — a 61.8% difference. The Radeon R9 M365X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M365X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon R9 M365X
TDP	142W	75W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	10.4	19.8+90%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 4000 came in at $1199, while the Radeon R9 M365X launched at $250. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M365X was 79.1% cheaper ($949 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (Quadro 4000) vs 5.9 (Radeon R9 M365X) — the Radeon R9 M365X offers 391.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M365X (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon R9 M365X
MSRP	$1199	$250-79%
Performance per Dollar	1.2	5.9+392%
Codename	GF100	Tropo
Release	November 2 2010	May 5 2015
Ranking	#770	#769

Search Quadro 4000 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M365X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.