Quadro 4000 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

NVIDIA

Quadro 4000

2010Core: 475 MHz
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

Quadro 4000 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 4000 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 4000

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 846.7% higher power demand at 142W vs 15W.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

2021

Why buy it

  • Quadro 4000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 15W instead of 142W, a 127W reduction.
  • More future proof: Gen. 12 (2021−2023) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (1,500 vs 1,475), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 4000 vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 4000

The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) uses Gen. 12, both on 40 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)).

FeatureQuadro 4000UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
G3D Mark Score
1,475
1,500+2%
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 12
Process Node
40 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
256+700%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 4000UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) carries 0 MB. Quadro 4000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 4000 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H).

FeatureQuadro 4000UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)'s 15W — a 161.8% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureQuadro 4000UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
TDP
142W
15W-89%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Perf/Watt
10.4
100.0+862%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 4000 came in at $1199, while the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) was 100+% cheaper ($1199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (Quadro 4000) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (2021 vs 2010).

FeatureQuadro 4000UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
MSRP
$1199
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
Infinity
Codename
GF100
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
November 2 2010
May 11 2021
Ranking
#770
#709

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.