
Quadro 4000

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Quadro 4000 vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro 4000 vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Quadro 4000 vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro 4000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro 4000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌846.7% higher power demand at 142W vs 15W.
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 142W, a 127W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro 4000 vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 4000
The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. The core clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 32 (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475 | 1,500+2% |
| Shading Units | 256+700% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) carries 0 MB. Quadro 4000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 4000 and System on the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)'s 15W — a 161.8% difference. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 142W | 15W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 10.4 | 100.0+862% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro 4000 came in at $1199, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) was 100+% cheaper ($1199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (Quadro 4000) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) — the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF100 | — |
| Release | November 2 2010 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #770 | #776 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















