Quadro 4000 vs UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Quadro 4000
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 4000 is positioned at rank #339 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro 4000 is significantly newer (2010 vs 0). The Quadro 4000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 4000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 4000 | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | Legacy (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000 and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Quadro 4000
The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. The core clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) reaches 1,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 32 (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475 | 1,500+2% |
| Shading Units | 256+700% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 4000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) has 0 MB. The Quadro 4000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)'s 15W — a 161.8% difference. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 1W (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 142W | 15W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 10.4 | 100.0+862% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 4000 launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.2 (Quadro 4000) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)) — the UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF100 | — |
| Release | November 2 2010 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #770 | #776 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 4000 and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
