
Quadro 4000 vs Radeon RX Vega 6

Quadro 4000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 4000 is positioned at rank #339 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 6 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon RX Vega 6 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 6 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 4000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 4000 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega 6 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000 and Radeon RX Vega 6

Quadro 4000
The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Radeon RX Vega 6
The Radeon RX Vega 6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,492 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the Radeon RX Vega 6 reaches 1,492 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon RX Vega 6 uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 6). Raw compute: 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 6).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,475 | 1,492+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 4096+1500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4864 TFLOPS | 12.66 TFLOPS+2503% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 256+700% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 4000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 has 0 MB. The Quadro 4000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 4000) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 6) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the Radeon RX Vega 6's 295W — a 70% difference. The Quadro 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 142W-52% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 10.4+104% | 5.1 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 4000 launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega 6 costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 49.2 (Quadro 4000) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 6 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro 4000 | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF100 | Vega 10 |
| Release | November 2 2010 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #770 | #171 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















