Quadro 4000 vs Radeon RX Vega 6

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon RX Vega 6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 4000

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon RX Vega 6 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro 4000 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 142W instead of 295W, a 153W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 6 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon RX Vega 6

2017

Why buy it

✅45.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
❌107.7% higher power demand at 295W vs 142W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX Vega 6 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (1,492 vs 1,475), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon RX Vega 6 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro 4000 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 4000

The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Radeon RX Vega 6

The Radeon RX Vega 6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,492 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 4000 scores 1,475 and the Radeon RX Vega 6 reaches 1,492 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000 is built on Fermi while the Radeon RX Vega 6 uses GCN 5.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro 4000) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 6). Raw compute: 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 6).

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon RX Vega 6
G3D Mark Score	1,475	1,492+1%
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 5.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	256	4096+1500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4864 TFLOPS	12.66 TFLOPS+2503%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	32	256+700%
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon RX Vega 6
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 carries 0 MB. Quadro 4000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 4000 and System on the Radeon RX Vega 6. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 4000) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 6) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon RX Vega 6
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 4000 draws 142W versus the Radeon RX Vega 6's 295W — a 70% difference. The Quadro 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon RX Vega 6
TDP	142W-52%	295W
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Perf/Watt	10.4+104%	5.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 4000 came in at $1199, while the Radeon RX Vega 6 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 6 was 100+% cheaper ($1199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (Quadro 4000) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 6) — the Radeon RX Vega 6 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 6 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 4000	Radeon RX Vega 6
MSRP	$1199	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	1.2	Infinity
Codename	GF100	Vega 10
Release	November 2 2010	August 7 2017
Ranking	#770	#171

Search Quadro 4000 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX Vega 6 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.