
Radeon 540 vs Quadro 4000

Radeon 540
Popular choices:

Quadro 4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 540 is positioned at rank 93 and the Quadro 4000 is on rank 339, so the Radeon 540 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 540
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 4000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 540 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon 540 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 540.
| Insight | Radeon 540 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 4000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 4000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 35.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 540 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+35.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 540 and Quadro 4000

Radeon 540
The Radeon 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points. Launch price was $79.

Quadro 4000
The Quadro 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 142W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 540 scores 1,452 and the Quadro 4000 reaches 1,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 540 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro 4000 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 540) vs 256 (Quadro 4000). Raw compute: 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon 540) vs 0.4864 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000).
| Feature | Radeon 540 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,452 | 1,475+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9085 TFLOPS+87% | 0.4864 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 512 KB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 540 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 540 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 4000 has 2 GB. The Quadro 4000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 540 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 540 draws 50W versus the Quadro 4000's 142W — a 95.8% difference. The Radeon 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 540) vs 350W (Quadro 4000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 540 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-65% | 142W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 29.0+179% | 10.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 540 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Quadro 4000 launched at $1199 and now averages $30. The Quadro 4000 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.3 (Radeon 540) vs 49.2 (Quadro 4000) — the Quadro 4000 offers 35.5% better value. The Radeon 540 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon 540 | Quadro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-92% | $1199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $30-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.3 | 49.2+36% |
| Codename | Lexa | GF100 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | November 2 2010 |
| Ranking | #773 | #770 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















