
Radeon 620 vs Radeon HD 6750M

Radeon 620
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 620 is positioned at rank 375 and the Radeon HD 6750M is on rank 236, so the Radeon HD 6750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 620
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6750M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 620 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Radeon 620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6750M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 6750M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $60 for the Radeon HD 6750M, it costs 17% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 22.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+22.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 620 and Radeon HD 6750M

Radeon 620
The Radeon 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 954 points.

Radeon HD 6750M
The Radeon HD 6750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 937 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 620 scores 954 and the Radeon HD 6750M reaches 937 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 620 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon HD 6750M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 620) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6750M). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 620) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6750M).
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 954+2% | 937 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS+37% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+100% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 620 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6750M has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 6750M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 620) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 6750M) — the Radeon HD 6750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 620 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 6750M's 35W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 620) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6750M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 35W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 19.1 | 26.8+40% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 620 costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (Radeon 620) vs 15.6 (Radeon HD 6750M) — the Radeon 620 offers 22.4% better value. The Radeon 620 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 6750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-17% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1+22% | 15.6 |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Whistler |
| Release | May 13 2019 | January 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #898 | #905 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











