Radeon 620 vs Radeon R7 A265

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 620 vs Radeon R7 A265 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 620 vs Radeon R7 A265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 620

2019

Why buy it

✅1.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Radeon R7 A265 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 620 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A265

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 620 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
49% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 620 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 A265 instead at 994 vs 954, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 620 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $49 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 43% (9.5 vs 6.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon 620 vs Radeon R7 A265 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 620

The Radeon 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 954 points.

Radeon R7 A265

The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 620 scores 954 and the Radeon R7 A265 reaches 994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 620 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R7 A265 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 620) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A265). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 620) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 620	Radeon R7 A265
G3D Mark Score	954	994+4%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS+24%	0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1024 MHz+24%	825 MHz
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 620	Radeon R7 A265
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon 620 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A265. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 620) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A265) — the Radeon R7 A265 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 620	Radeon R7 A265
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 620 draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 A265's 30W — a 50% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 620) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A265). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon 620	Radeon R7 A265
TDP	50W	30W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	19.1	33.1+73%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 620 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 A265 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon 620 was 32.9% cheaper ($49 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.5 (Radeon 620) vs 6.7 (Radeon R7 A265) — the Radeon 620 offers 41.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 620 (2019 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon 620	Radeon R7 A265
MSRP	$100-33%	$149
Performance per Dollar	9.5+42%	6.7
Codename	Polaris 24	Opal
Release	May 13 2019	January 9 2014
Ranking	#898	#890

Search Radeon 620 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A265 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.