CPU
GPU
Quadro 2000D
Popular choices:
Radeon 620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000D is positioned at rank 311 and the Radeon 620 is on rank 375, so the Quadro 2000D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000D
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 620
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 620 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2011). The Radeon 620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 2000D lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 620.
| Insight | Quadro 2000D | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Radeon 620, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 28.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 2000D | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+28.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000D and Radeon 620
Quadro 2000D
The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon 620
The Radeon 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 954 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000D scores 980 and the Radeon 620 reaches 954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000D is built on Fermi while the Radeon 620 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000D) vs 384 (Radeon 620). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 620).
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 980+3% | 954 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+64% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+167% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 620 has 512 MB. The Quadro 2000D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2000D) vs 128 KB (Radeon 620) — the Quadro 2000D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000D draws 62W versus the Radeon 620's 50W — a 21.4% difference. The Radeon 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000D) vs 350W (Radeon 620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W | 50W-19% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 15.8 | 19.1+21% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon 620 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Quadro 2000D costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.5 (Quadro 2000D) vs 19.1 (Radeon 620) — the Quadro 2000D offers 28.3% better value. The Radeon 620 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Radeon 620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $100-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-20% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.5+28% | 19.1 |
| Codename | GF106 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | October 5 2011 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #892 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000D and Radeon 620
