Quadro 2000D vs Radeon HD 7690M XT

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

2011Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7690M XT

2013Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon HD 7690M XT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon HD 7690M XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon HD 7690M XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000D

2011

Why buy it

  • 16.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 299.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 148% higher power demand at 62W vs 25W.

Radeon HD 7690M XT

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $449 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 311.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 62W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 2000D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 2000D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7690M XT instead at 1,009 vs 980, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 2000D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7690M XT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $449 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 311.2% (6.7 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7690M XT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2000D has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon HD 7690M XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M XT

The Radeon HD 7690M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000D scores 980 and the Radeon HD 7690M XT reaches 1,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000D is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 7690M XT uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000D) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7690M XT).

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon HD 7690M XT
G3D Mark Score
980
1,009+3%
Architecture
Fermi
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
192
480+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.48 TFLOPS
0.696 TFLOPS+45%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
256 KB+433%
48 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon HD 7690M XT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000D has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7690M XT carries 2 GB. Quadro 2000D gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000D and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7690M XT.

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon HD 7690M XT
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000D draws 62W versus the Radeon HD 7690M XT's 25W — a 85.1% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000D) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon HD 7690M XT
TDP
62W
25W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
15.8
40.4+156%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000D came in at $599, while the Radeon HD 7690M XT launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7690M XT was 75% cheaper ($449 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro 2000D) vs 6.7 (Radeon HD 7690M XT) — the Radeon HD 7690M XT offers 318.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7690M XT (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP
$599
$150-75%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
6.7+319%
Codename
GF106
Thames
Release
October 5 2011
January 7 2013
Ranking
#892
#883

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.