CPU
GPU
Quadro 2000D
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 4800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000D is positioned at rank 311 and the Quadro FX 4800 is on rank 379, so the Quadro 2000D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000D
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 4800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 2000D | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000D holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $80), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 95% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 2000D | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+95%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000D and Quadro FX 4800
Quadro 2000D
The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.
Quadro FX 4800
The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000D scores 980 and the Quadro FX 4800 reaches 1,005 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000D is built on Fermi while the Quadro FX 4800 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000D) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4800). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4800).
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 980 | 1,005+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS+4% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4800 has 2 GB. The Quadro 2000D offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2000D) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4800) — the Quadro 2000D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+167% | 1.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000D draws 62W versus the Quadro FX 4800's 150W — a 83% difference. The Quadro 2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000D) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W-59% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 15.8+136% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Quadro FX 4800 launched at $1799 and now averages $80. The Quadro 2000D costs 50% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.5 (Quadro 2000D) vs 12.6 (Quadro FX 4800) — the Quadro 2000D offers 94.4% better value. The Quadro 2000D is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Quadro FX 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599-67% | $1799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-50% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.5+94% | 12.6 |
| Codename | GF106 | GT200B |
| Release | October 5 2011 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #892 | #884 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000D and Quadro FX 4800
