CPU
GPU
Quadro 2000D
Popular choices:
GeForce 830M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000D is positioned at rank 311 and the GeForce 830M is on rank 157, so the GeForce 830M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000D
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 830M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 830M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro 2000D | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 830M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 830M holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 36.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 2000D | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+36.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000D and GeForce 830M
Quadro 2000D
The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.
GeForce 830M
The GeForce 830M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000D scores 980 and the GeForce 830M reaches 1,005 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000D is built on Fermi while the GeForce 830M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000D) vs 256 (GeForce 830M). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 830M).
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 980 | 1,005+3% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 256+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 0.5888 TFLOPS+23% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+100% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 830M has 2 GB. The Quadro 2000D offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro 2000D) vs 1 MB (GeForce 830M) — the GeForce 830M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000D draws 62W versus the GeForce 830M's 33W — a 61.1% difference. The GeForce 830M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000D) vs 350W (GeForce 830M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W | 33W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 15.8 | 30.5+93% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 830M costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.5 (Quadro 2000D) vs 33.5 (GeForce 830M) — the GeForce 830M offers 36.7% better value. The GeForce 830M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $30-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.5 | 33.5+37% |
| Codename | GF106 | GM108 |
| Release | October 5 2011 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #892 | #885 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000D and GeForce 830M
