Quadro 2000D
VS
GeForce GT 1010

Quadro 2000D vs GeForce GT 1010

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

2011Core: 625 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 1010

2021Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000D is positioned at rank 311 and the GeForce GT 1010 is on rank 98, so the GeForce GT 1010 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000D

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
96%
#296
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9008%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
100%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
99%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
98%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
96%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
96%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
94%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
93%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
93%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
93%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
92%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
90%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
87%
#324
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
87%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
85%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 1010

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
522%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
502%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
496%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
495%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
494%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
491%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
485%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
483%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
479%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
477%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
472%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
471%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
462%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
462%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
99%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
89%
#83
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
576%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
88%
#98
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
100%
#99
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
100%
#101
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
97%
#102
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
97%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
94%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
91%
#107
Radeon R7 250
MSRP: $89|Avg: $25
85%
#108
GeForce GT 640
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
85%
#109
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
85%
#111
Radeon HD 8550D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
82%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
81%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GT 1010 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2011). The GeForce GT 1010 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 2000D lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 2000D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 1010.

InsightQuadro 2000DGeForce GT 1010
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro 2000D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $70 for the GeForce GT 1010, it costs 43% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 76.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro 2000DGeForce GT 1010
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+76.4%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000D and GeForce GT 1010

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 1010

The GeForce GT 1010 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 13 2021. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 972 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000D scores 980 and the GeForce GT 1010 reaches 972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000D is built on Fermi while the GeForce GT 1010 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000D) vs 256 (GeForce GT 1010). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D) vs 0.7516 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 1010).

FeatureQuadro 2000DGeForce GT 1010
G3D Mark Score
980
972
Architecture
Fermi
Pascal
Process Node
40 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
192
256+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.48 TFLOPS
0.7516 TFLOPS+57%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32+100%
16
L1 Cache
256 KB+700%
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 2000DGeForce GT 1010
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 1010 has 512 MB. The Quadro 2000D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureQuadro 2000DGeForce GT 1010
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000D draws 62W versus the GeForce GT 1010's 30W — a 69.6% difference. The GeForce GT 1010 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000D) vs 300W (GeForce GT 1010). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro 2000DGeForce GT 1010
TDP
62W
30W-52%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
147mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
15.8
32.4+105%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro 2000D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GT 1010 launched at $70 and now averages $70. The Quadro 2000D costs 42.9% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.5 (Quadro 2000D) vs 13.9 (GeForce GT 1010) — the Quadro 2000D offers 76.3% better value. The GeForce GT 1010 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2011).

FeatureQuadro 2000DGeForce GT 1010
MSRP
$599
$70-88%
Avg Price (30d)
$40-43%
$70
Performance per Dollar
24.5+76%
13.9
Codename
GF106
GP108
Release
October 5 2011
January 13 2021
Ranking
#892
#895