Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

2011Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014Core: 720 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000D

2011

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1122.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 106.7% higher power demand at 62W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

2014

Why buy it

  • 73.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $550 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1147.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 62W, a 32W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 73.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (1,000 vs 980), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 2000D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $550 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1147.4% (20.4 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2000D has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 14 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000D scores 980 and the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) reaches 1,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000D is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) uses GCN, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000D) vs 384 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)).

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
G3D Mark Score
980
1,000+2%
Architecture
Fermi
GCN
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
384+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000D has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) carries 512 MB. Quadro 2000D gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000D and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000D draws 62W versus the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)'s 30W — a 69.6% difference. The Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000D) vs 350W (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
TDP
62W
30W-52%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
15.8
33.3+111%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000D came in at $599, while the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) was 91.8% cheaper ($550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro 2000D) vs 20.4 (Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)) — the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) offers 1175% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
MSRP
$599
$49-92%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
20.4+1175%
Codename
GF106
Kaveri Spectre
Release
October 5 2011
January 14 2014
Ranking
#892
#865

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.