Quadro 2000D
VS
Radeon R7 340

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 340

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

2011Core: 625 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 340

2015Boost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000D is positioned at rank 311 and the Radeon R7 340 is on rank 130, so the Radeon R7 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000D

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
96%
#296
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9008%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
100%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
99%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
98%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
96%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
96%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
94%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
93%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
93%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
93%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
92%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
90%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
87%
#324
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
87%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
85%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 340

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
748%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
718%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
710%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
709%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
707%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
703%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
695%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
692%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
686%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
684%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
675%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
674%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
662%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
661%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
97%
#86
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
94%
#115
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
825%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
100%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
99%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
98%
#136
Radeon HD 8570
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#137
Radeon R5 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
97%
#139
GeForce GT 730
MSRP: $89|Avg: $45
95%
#140
Radeon HD 8400E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
95%
#142
Radeon HD 8400
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
93%
#143
Radeon HD 5750
MSRP: $130|Avg: $25
93%
#145
Radeon HD 8330E
MSRP: $30|Avg: $5
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro 2000D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 340.

InsightQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 340
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $40), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 56.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 340
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+56.7%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40)
More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000D and Radeon R7 340

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R7 340

The Radeon R7 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 960 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000D scores 980 and the Radeon R7 340 reaches 960 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000D is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 340 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000D) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 340). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 340).

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 340
G3D Mark Score
980+2%
960
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
1024+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.48 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS+316%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 340
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 340 has 512 MB. The Quadro 2000D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2000D) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 340) — the Radeon R7 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 340
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000D draws 62W versus the Radeon R7 340's 100W — a 46.9% difference. The Quadro 2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000D) vs 300W (Radeon R7 340). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 340
TDP
62W-38%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Perf/Watt
15.8+65%
9.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro 2000D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R7 340 launched at $99 and now averages $25. The Radeon R7 340 costs 37.5% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.5 (Quadro 2000D) vs 38.4 (Radeon R7 340) — the Radeon R7 340 offers 56.7% better value. The Radeon R7 340 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureQuadro 2000DRadeon R7 340
MSRP
$599
$99-83%
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$25-38%
Performance per Dollar
24.5
38.4+57%
Codename
GF106
Trinidad
Release
October 5 2011
June 18 2015
Ranking
#892
#467