Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 340

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 2000D

2011

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 62W instead of 100W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 340 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
505.1% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon R7 340

2015

Why buy it

✅77.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 492.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.7 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌61.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 62W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 340 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 77.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 2000D instead at 980 vs 960, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 2000D is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 340 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $500 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 492.7% (9.7 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 340 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 2000D has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R7 340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 2000D

The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R7 340

The Radeon R7 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 960 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 2000D scores 980 and the Radeon R7 340 reaches 960 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000D is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 340 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000D) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 340). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 340).

Feature	Quadro 2000D	Radeon R7 340
G3D Mark Score	980+2%	960
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	1024+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	1.997 TFLOPS+316%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 2000D	Radeon R7 340
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 2000D has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 340 carries 512 MB. Quadro 2000D gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 2000D and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 340. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro 2000D) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 340) — the Radeon R7 340 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 2000D	Radeon R7 340
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 2000D draws 62W versus the Radeon R7 340's 100W — a 46.9% difference. The Quadro 2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000D) vs 300W (Radeon R7 340). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro 2000D	Radeon R7 340
TDP	62W-38%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Perf/Watt	15.8+65%	9.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 2000D came in at $599, while the Radeon R7 340 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R7 340 was 83.5% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (Quadro 2000D) vs 9.7 (Radeon R7 340) — the Radeon R7 340 offers 506.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 340 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro 2000D	Radeon R7 340
MSRP	$599	$99-83%
Performance per Dollar	1.6	9.7+506%
Codename	GF106	Trinidad
Release	October 5 2011	June 18 2015
Ranking	#892	#467

Search Quadro 2000D on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 340 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.