CPU
GPU
Quadro 2000D
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M270DX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 2000D is positioned at rank 311 and the Radeon R7 M270DX is on rank 372, so the Quadro 2000D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000D
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M270DX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 2000D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M270DX.
| Insight | Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M270DX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M270DX holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $40), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 96.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+96.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 2000D and Radeon R7 M270DX
Quadro 2000D
The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon R7 M270DX
The Radeon R7 M270DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 962 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 2000D scores 980 and the Radeon R7 M270DX reaches 962 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 2000D is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 M270DX uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro 2000D) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270DX). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D) vs 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270DX).
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 980+2% | 962 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 384+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 0.7219 TFLOPS+50% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+167% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 2000D comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M270DX has 512 MB. The Quadro 2000D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 2000D draws 62W versus the Radeon R7 M270DX's 75W — a 19% difference. The Quadro 2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 2000D) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270DX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 62W-17% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 15.8+23% | 12.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 2000D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R7 M270DX launched at $100 and now averages $20. The Radeon R7 M270DX costs 50% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.5 (Quadro 2000D) vs 48.1 (Radeon R7 M270DX) — the Radeon R7 M270DX offers 96.3% better value. The Radeon R7 M270DX is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 2000D | Radeon R7 M270DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $100-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $20-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.5 | 48.1+96% |
| Codename | GF106 | Topaz |
| Release | October 5 2011 | June 11 2014 |
| Ranking | #892 | #897 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 2000D and Radeon R7 M270DX
