Radeon 620 vs Radeon R9 M375
Radeon 620
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 620 is positioned at rank 375 and the Radeon R9 M375 is on rank 565, so the Radeon 620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 620
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M375
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 620 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M375 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M375 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 620.
| Insight | Radeon 620 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.6%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $300 for the Radeon R9 M375, it costs 83% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 473.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 620 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+473.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 620 and Radeon R9 M375
Radeon 620
The Radeon 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 954 points.
Radeon R9 M375
The Radeon R9 M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 998 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 620 scores 954 and the Radeon R9 M375 reaches 998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 620 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 620) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 620) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1015 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 954 | 998+5% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7864 TFLOPS | 1.299 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1024 MHz | 1015 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 160 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 620 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M375 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 620) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M375) — the Radeon R9 M375 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 64 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 620 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M375's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 620) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 19.1+44% | 13.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 620 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon R9 M375 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Radeon 620 costs 83.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (Radeon 620) vs 3.3 (Radeon R9 M375) — the Radeon 620 offers 478.8% better value. The Radeon 620 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon R9 M375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-67% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-83% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1+479% | 3.3 |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | Tropo |
| Release | May 13 2019 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #898 | #889 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 620 and Radeon R9 M375
