
Radeon 620
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 620 is positioned at rank 375 and the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is on rank 524, so the Radeon 620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 620
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 620 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Radeon 620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 620.
| Insight | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Radeon 620, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 30.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+30.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 620 and Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual

Radeon 620
The Radeon 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 954 points.

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 997 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 620 scores 954 and the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual reaches 997 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 620) vs 640 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual).
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 954 | 997+5% |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 620 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual's 50W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 620) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 19.1 | 19.9+4% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 620 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual launched at $250 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.1 (Radeon 620) vs 24.9 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual) — the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual offers 30.4% better value. The Radeon 620 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon 620 | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-60% | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.1 | 24.9+30% |
| Codename | Polaris 24 | — |
| Release | May 13 2019 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #898 | #863 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













