Radeon 660M vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 660M is positioned at rank #399 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 660M

#389

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1349%

#391

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1223%

#392

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1219%

#396

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1109%

#397

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1101%

#399

Radeon 660M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#400

Radeon R9 M290X

MSRP: $400|Avg: $60

100%

#401

Radeon HD 7670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

100%

#402

Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#403

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

97%

#404

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#406

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

97%

#407

Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

93%

#408

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

93%

#409

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

91%

#410

Radeon R7 M260X

MSRP: $139|Avg: $35

91%

#411

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6570 Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $25

90%

#412

Intel UHD Graphics 615

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

89%

#413

Radeon R7 A365

MSRP: $109|Avg: $55

89%

#414

Radeon 3015e

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 144.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 660M.

Insight	Radeon 660M	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-144.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+144.3%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 660M Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 660M and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon 660M

The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon 660M scores 3,221 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 144.3%. The Radeon 660M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 660M) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1900 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon 660M	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	3,221	7,869+144%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.459 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+105%
Boost Clock	1900 MHz+14%	1665 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	128 KB	896 KB+600%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 660M	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 660M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 660M) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 660M	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	128 GB/s
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 660M draws 40W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 660M) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.