RADEON 7200 vs GeForce4 440

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 7200 is positioned at rank 750 and the GeForce4 440 is on rank 755, so the RADEON 7200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 7200

#738

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

361900%

#740

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

328067%

#741

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

327200%

#745

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

297533%

#746

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

295500%

#748

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#749

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#750

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

100%

#751

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

100%

#752

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

67%

#753

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

33%

#754

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

33%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce4 440

#745

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1085700%

#747

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

984200%

#748

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

981600%

#752

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

892600%

#753

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

886500%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

100%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON 7200 uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON 7200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce4 440 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce4 440 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 66.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 7200.

Insight	RADEON 7200	GeForce4 440
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-66.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+66.7%)
Longevity	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce4 440 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $45), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 53.1% better value per dollar than the RADEON 7200.

Insight	RADEON 7200	GeForce4 440
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+53.1%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($45)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON 7200 Benchmark Check

GeForce4 440 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 7200 and GeForce4 440

RADEON 7200

The RADEON 7200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

GeForce4 440

The GeForce4 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 7200 scores 3 versus the GeForce4 440's 5 — the GeForce4 440 leads by 66.7%. The RADEON 7200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce4 440 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 7200) vs 384 (GeForce4 440). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 7200) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce4 440). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1176 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce4 440
G3D Mark Score	3	5+67%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	0.9032 TFLOPS+15%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz	1176 MHz+15%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	192 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce4 440
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (RADEON 7200) vs 1 MB (GeForce4 440) — the GeForce4 440 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce4 440
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (RADEON 7200) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 440). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce4 440
DirectX	7.0	7.0
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	1.3	1.5+15%
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 7200) vs None (GeForce4 440). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Comp vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 7200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 440).

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce4 440
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	MPEG-2 Motion Comp	None
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 7200 draws 50W versus the GeForce4 440's 33W — a 41% difference. The GeForce4 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 7200) vs 350W (GeForce4 440). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70.

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce4 440
TDP	50W	33W-34%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	170mm
Height	0mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	70	70
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.2+100%

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 7200 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the GeForce4 440 launched at $469 and now averages $49. The RADEON 7200 costs 8.2% less ($4 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (RADEON 7200) vs 0.1 (GeForce4 440) — the GeForce4 440 offers 0% better value. The RADEON 7200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).