RADEON 7200 vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 7200 is positioned at rank 750 and the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is on rank 750, so the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 7200

#738

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

361900%

#740

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

328067%

#741

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

327200%

#745

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

297533%

#746

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

295500%

#748

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#749

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#750

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

100%

#751

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

100%

#752

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

67%

#753

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

33%

#754

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

33%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce2 MX/MX 400

#740

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

361900%

#742

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

328067%

#743

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

327200%

#747

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

297533%

#748

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

295500%

#750

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

100%

#751

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

100%

#752

RADEON 7200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $45

100%

#753

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

100%

#754

GeForce2 MX

MSRP: $129|Avg: $49

67%

#755

GeForce4 440

MSRP: $469|Avg: $49

33%

#756

GeForce3

MSRP: $499|Avg: $49

33%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 7200.

Insight	RADEON 7200	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Longevity	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $45 for the RADEON 7200, it costs 67% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 300% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON 7200	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+300%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45)	✅More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON 7200 Benchmark Check

GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 7200 and GeForce2 MX/MX 400

RADEON 7200

The RADEON 7200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 7200 scores 3 versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 4 — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 leads by 33.3%. The RADEON 7200 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (RADEON 7200) vs 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (RADEON 7200) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Boost clocks: 1024 MHz vs 1575 MHz.

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
G3D Mark Score	3	4+33%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS	3.226 TFLOPS+310%
Boost Clock	1024 MHz	1575 MHz+54%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	64+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 7.0 (RADEON 7200) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). OpenGL: 1.3 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
DirectX	7.0	7.0
OpenGL	1.3+8%	1.2
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 7200) vs None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Comp vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 7200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400).

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	MPEG-2 Motion Comp	MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 7200 draws 50W versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 25W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 7200) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 55°C.

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
TDP	50W	25W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	70	55°C-21%
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.2+100%

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 7200 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129 and now averages $15. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 costs 66.7% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (RADEON 7200) vs 0.3 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) — the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 offers 200% better value. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).

Feature	RADEON 7200	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP	$99-23%	$129
Avg Price (30d)	$45	$15-67%
Performance per Dollar	0.1	0.3+200%
Codename	Polaris 24	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release	May 13 2019	August 1 2020
Ranking	#898	#523