Radeon 820M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 820M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 820M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 820M

2024

Why buy it

✅39.4% more average FPS across 32 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 30W instead of 65W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 820M across 32 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌116.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 820M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 39.4% in average FPS across 32 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro WX 3200 instead at 2,209 vs 2,143, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 820M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 820M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 820M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 820M

The Radeon 820M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,143 points.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 820M scores 2,143 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 reaches 2,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 820M is built on RDNA 3+ while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon 820M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	Radeon 820M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score	2,143	2,209+3%
Architecture	RDNA 3+	GCN 4.0
Process Node	4 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	128	640+400%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 820M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 820M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 820M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3200.

Feature	Radeon 820M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon 820M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon 820M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 820M) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 820M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	Radeon 820M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Encoder	VCN 4.0	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	VCN 4.0	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 820M draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 73.7% difference. The Radeon 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 820M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 82°C.

Feature	Radeon 820M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP	30W-54%	65W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	168mm
Height	0mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80-2%	82°C
Perf/Watt	71.4+110%	34.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 820M (2024 vs 2019).

Feature	Radeon 820M	Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP	—	$199
Codename	Krackan Point	Polaris 23
Release	June 2 2024	July 2 2019
Ranking	#669	#659

Search Radeon 820M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 3200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.