Radeon 820M vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Radeon 820M
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 820M is positioned at rank #62 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 820M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 820M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 820M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $25 for the Radeon 820M, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 28.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 820M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+28.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 820M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Radeon 820M
The Radeon 820M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,143 points.
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 820M scores 2,143 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 820M is built on RDNA 3+ while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs uses Gen. 12, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon 820M) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 820M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,143 | 2,200+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3+ | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 128+300% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+100% | 1450 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 820M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 820M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has 0 MB. The Radeon 820M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Radeon 820M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 820M draws 30W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 820M) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon 820M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4 | 146.7+105% |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs costs 20% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 85.7 (Radeon 820M) vs 110.0 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers 28.4% better value. The Radeon 820M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon 820M | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $20-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.7 | 110.0+28% |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | June 2 2024 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #669 | #744 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 820M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
