Radeon 820M
VS
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Radeon 820M vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

AMD

Radeon 820M

2024Boost: 2900 MHz
VS
Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

2021Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 820M is positioned at rank #62 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 820M

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
96%
#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
92%
#52
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
203%
#54
184%
#55
183%
#59
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
167%
#60
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
165%
#62
Radeon 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
100%
#65
98%
#66
98%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 820M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon 820MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)
Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Longevity
RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm)
Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 820M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

AMD

Radeon 820M

The Radeon 820M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,143 points.

Intel

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 820M scores 2,143 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 820M is built on RDNA 3+ while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) uses Gen. 12, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon 820M) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 820MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
G3D Mark Score
2,143
2,200+3%
Architecture
RDNA 3+
Gen. 12
Process Node
4 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
128+300%
32
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+100%
1450 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 820MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 820M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has 0 MB. The Radeon 820M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureRadeon 820MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon 820M) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon 820MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 820M) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs Quick Sync Video (Xe). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 820M) vs AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)).

FeatureRadeon 820MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Encoder
VCN 4.0
Quick Sync Video (Xe)
Decoder
VCN 4.0
Quick Sync Video (Xe)
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 820M draws 30W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 66.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 820M) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon 820MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
TDP
30W
15W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
71.4
146.7+105%
💰

Value Analysis

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) costs 100+% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 85.7 (Radeon 820M) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon 820M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).

FeatureRadeon 820MUHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$25
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
85.7
Infinity
Codename
Krackan Point
Rocket Lake Xe
Release
June 2 2024
March 30 2021
Ranking
#669
#809