
Radeon 820M

Radeon R9 M385
Radeon 820M vs Radeon R9 M385 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 820M vs Radeon R9 M385 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Apex Legends

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Cyberpunk 2077

Elden Ring

Euro Truck Simulator 2
Radeon 820M vs Radeon R9 M385: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 820M
2024Why buy it
- ✅36.5% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M385
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 820M across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 820M vs Radeon R9 M385 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 820M
The Radeon 820M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,143 points.

Radeon R9 M385
The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 820M scores 2,143 and the Radeon R9 M385 reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 820M is built on RDNA 3+ while the Radeon R9 M385 uses GCN 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon 820M) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 820M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,143+4% | 2,061 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3+ | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 896+600% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+164% | 1100 MHz |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 820M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 820M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M385 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 820M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385.
| Feature | Radeon 820M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 820M draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M385's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 820M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 820M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4+160% | 27.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 820M (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 820M | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Strato |
| Release | June 2 2024 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #669 | #674 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















