Radeon 840M vs Radeon Pro 560X

AMD

Radeon 840M

2024Boost: 2900 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

2018Core: 1004 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon 840M

2024

Why buy it

  • 7.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro 560X

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon 840M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon 840M better than Radeon Pro 560X?
Yes. Radeon 840M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon 840M averages 7.4% more FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 3,803 vs 3,678 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon 840M is a 2024 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon Pro 560X is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 840M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018 and a 4nm process instead of 14nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon 840M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Radeon 840M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon 840M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 7.4% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.4% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (30W vs 75W), and FSR upscaling.
Is Radeon Pro 560X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon Pro 560X is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon 840M is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR upscaling.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon 840MRadeon Pro 560X
1080p
low68 FPS38 FPS
medium56 FPS23 FPS
high41 FPS16 FPS
ultra28 FPS9 FPS
1440p
low53 FPS25 FPS
medium44 FPS15 FPS
high29 FPS8 FPS
ultra20 FPS4 FPS
4K
low23 FPS10 FPS
medium22 FPS7 FPS
high13 FPS4 FPS
ultra12 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon 840MRadeon Pro 560X
1080p
low124 FPS75 FPS
medium87 FPS46 FPS
high59 FPS33 FPS
ultra38 FPS19 FPS
1440p
low82 FPS36 FPS
medium50 FPS24 FPS
high37 FPS17 FPS
ultra26 FPS12 FPS
4K
low38 FPS10 FPS
medium26 FPS7 FPS
high21 FPS6 FPS
ultra15 FPS4 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon 840MRadeon Pro 560X
1080p
low171 FPS166 FPS
medium137 FPS132 FPS
high114 FPS110 FPS
ultra86 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low128 FPS124 FPS
medium103 FPS99 FPS
high86 FPS83 FPS
ultra64 FPS62 FPS
4K
low86 FPS83 FPS
medium68 FPS66 FPS
high57 FPS55 FPS
ultra43 FPS41 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon 840MRadeon Pro 560X
1080p
low141 FPS142 FPS
medium109 FPS110 FPS
high92 FPS92 FPS
ultra77 FPS76 FPS
1440p
low102 FPS102 FPS
medium79 FPS81 FPS
high67 FPS68 FPS
ultra54 FPS54 FPS
4K
low60 FPS60 FPS
medium47 FPS46 FPS
high37 FPS36 FPS
ultra28 FPS26 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 840M and Radeon Pro 560X

AMD

Radeon 840M

The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 840M scores 3,803 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 840M is built on RDNA 3+ while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 840M) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X).

FeatureRadeon 840MRadeon Pro 560X
G3D Mark Score
3,803+3%
3,678
Architecture
RDNA 3+
GCN 4.0
Process Node
4 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
256
1024+300%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 840MRadeon Pro 560X
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon 840MRadeon Pro 560X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon 840MRadeon Pro 560X
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X).

FeatureRadeon 840MRadeon Pro 560X
Encoder
VCN 4.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
VCN 4.0
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 840M draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 840M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 75.

FeatureRadeon 840MRadeon Pro 560X
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
90
75-17%
Perf/Watt
126.8+159%
49.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 840M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).

FeatureRadeon 840MRadeon Pro 560X
MSRP
$0
Codename
Krackan Point
Polaris 21
Release
June 2 2024
July 16 2018
Ranking
#516
#528