
Radeon 840M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 560X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 840M
2024Why buy it
- ✅7.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 840M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Radeon 840M
2024Radeon Pro 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅7.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 840M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 840M better than Radeon Pro 560X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 560X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 840M and Radeon Pro 560X

Radeon 840M
Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 840M scores 3,803 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 840M is built on RDNA 3+ while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 840M) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,803+3% | 3,678 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3+ | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1024+300% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 840M draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 840M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | 75-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.8+159% | 49.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 840M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Polaris 21 |
| Release | June 2 2024 | July 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #516 | #528 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












