
Radeon 840M

Radeon RX 560
Radeon 840M vs Radeon RX 560 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 840M vs Radeon RX 560 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Civilization VI

Cyberpunk 2077
Radeon 840M vs Radeon RX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 840M
2024Why buy it
- ✅6.4% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 37.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 840M across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 840M vs Radeon RX 560 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Radeon RX 560
The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 840M scores 3,803 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 840M is built on RDNA 3+ while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 840M) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1275 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,803+3% | 3,682 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3+ | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1024+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+127% | 1275 MHz |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon 840M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 840M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 560 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 840M and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 840M draws 30W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 840M) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 90 vs 70 C.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | 70 C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.8+158% | 49.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 840M (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Polaris 21 |
| Release | June 2 2024 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #516 | #527 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














