
Radeon 880M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 880M
2024Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 59.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 880M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Radeon 880M
2024Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 59.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 880M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 880M better than Radeon RX 5300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 86 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 880M and Radeon RX 5300

Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M
The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.

Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 880M scores 7,729 and the Radeon RX 5300 reaches 7,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 880M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon RX 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 880M) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300). Raw compute: 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,729+2% | 7,606 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1408+83% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.454 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+76% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 88+83% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5300 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 880M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 880M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300 has 3 GB. The Radeon 880M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 880M) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon 880M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 880M) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 880M draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 5300's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 880M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 180mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-85% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 180mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 515.3+577% | 76.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 880M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $129 |
| Codename | Strix Point | Navi 14 |
| Release | July 15 2024 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #329 | #336 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












