Radeon 880M vs Radeon RX 6400
Radeon 880M
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 880M is positioned at rank #209 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 880M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 880M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6400.
| Insight | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 880M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 880M and Radeon RX 6400
Radeon 880M
The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.
Radeon RX 6400
The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 880M scores 7,729 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 880M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 880M) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2321 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon 880M) vs 12 (Radeon RX 6400).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,729 | 7,728 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.454 TFLOPS+25% | 3.565 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+25% | 2321 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 880M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 880M) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon 880M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 880M) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 880M draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 111.8% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 880M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-72% | 53W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 172mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 515.3+253% | 145.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 880M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $159 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $139 |
| Codename | Strix Point | Navi 24 |
| Release | July 15 2024 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #329 | #330 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 880M and Radeon RX 6400
