
Radeon 880M vs T1000 8GB

Radeon 880M
Popular choices:

T1000 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 880M is positioned at rank 209 and the T1000 8GB is on rank 94, so the T1000 8GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 880M
Performance Per Dollar T1000 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 880M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T1000 8GB.
| Insight | Radeon 880M | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 880M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 880M and T1000 8GB

Radeon 880M
The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.

T1000 8GB
The T1000 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,674 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 880M scores 7,729 and the T1000 8GB reaches 7,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 880M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the T1000 8GB uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 880M) vs 896 (T1000 8GB). Raw compute: 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000 8GB). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,729 | 7,674 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 896+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.454 TFLOPS+78% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+108% | 1395 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 56+17% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 896 KB+600% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 880M | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 880M) vs 1 MB (T1000 8GB) — the Radeon 880M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 880M) vs 12.1 (T1000 8GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000 8GB). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000 8GB).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 880M draws 15W versus the T1000 8GB's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 880M) vs 350W (T1000 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 156mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 515.3+236% | 153.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 880M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | T1000 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $380 |
| Codename | Strix Point | TU117 |
| Release | July 15 2024 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #329 | #332 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















