
Radeon 880M
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon 880M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 880M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Radeon 880M
2024Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon 880M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 880M better than Radeon RX 6500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 310 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 880M and Radeon RX 6500

Radeon 880M
Radeon 880M
The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 880M scores 7,729 and the Radeon RX 6500 reaches 7,610 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,729+2% | 7,610 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 880M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 880M) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 880M draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 880M) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 172mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 515.3+408% | 101.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












