
Radeon 880M

Radeon RX 780
Radeon 880M vs Radeon RX 780 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 880M vs Radeon RX 780 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon 880M vs Radeon RX 780: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 880M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 780 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅154.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 880M vs Radeon RX 780 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 880M
The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.

Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 880M scores 7,729 and the Radeon RX 780 reaches 7,658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 880M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 880M) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2335 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon 880M) vs 60 (Radeon RX 780).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,729 | 7,658 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 3840+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.454 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+705% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+24% | 2335 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 48 | 240+400% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | 60+400% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon 880M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 880M and System on the Radeon RX 780. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 880M) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 880M) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 880M draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 169.2% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 880M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 880M | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-92% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 515.3+1112% | 42.5 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













