Radeon 880M vs Radeon RX 780

AMD

Radeon 880M

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 780

2024Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2335 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 880M vs Radeon RX 780 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 880M vs Radeon RX 780 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 880M vs Radeon RX 780: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 880M

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Radeon RX 780 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Radeon RX 780

2024

Why buy it

  • 154.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 780 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 154.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 880M instead at 7,729 vs 7,658, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 780 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon 880M has no comparable frame-generation support and 60 vs 12 ray-tracing units. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 780 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon 880M vs Radeon RX 780 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 880M

The Radeon 880M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,729 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 780

The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 880M scores 7,729 and the Radeon RX 780 reaches 7,658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 880M is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 880M) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon 880M) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2335 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon 880M) vs 60 (Radeon RX 780).

FeatureRadeon 880MRadeon RX 780
G3D Mark Score
7,729
7,658
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
4 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
768
3840+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS
35.87 TFLOPS+705%
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+24%
2335 MHz
ROPs
16
96+500%
TMUs
48
240+400%
L1 Cache
128 KB
768 KB+500%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR 3 + AFMF
Ray Tracing Cores
12
60+400%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon 880M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureRadeon 880MRadeon RX 780
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 880M and System on the Radeon RX 780. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 880M) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 880MRadeon RX 780
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 880M) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon 880MRadeon RX 780
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 880M) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 880M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).

FeatureRadeon 880MRadeon RX 780
Encoder
VCN 4.5
RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine
Decoder
VCN 4.5
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 880M draws 15W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 169.2% difference. The Radeon 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 880M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 880MRadeon RX 780
TDP
15W-92%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
515.3+1112%
42.5