
RADEON 9800 SE
Popular choices:

RADEON 9600SE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9600SE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9600SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9800 SE.
| Insight | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-12.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+12.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9800 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $65 for the RADEON 9600SE, it costs 54% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 92.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+92.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9800 SE and RADEON 9600SE

RADEON 9800 SE
The RADEON 9800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points.

RADEON 9600SE
The RADEON 9600SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9800 SE scores 24 versus the RADEON 9600SE's 27 — the RADEON 9600SE leads by 12.5%. The RADEON 9800 SE is built on RDNA 3.5 while the RADEON 9600SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on a 4 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9600SE). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600SE). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 40 (RADEON 9600SE).
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24 | 27+13% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS | 14.85 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9800 SE comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9600SE has 512 MB. The RADEON 9600SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9800 SE draws 55W versus the RADEON 9600SE's 55W — a 0% difference. The RADEON 9600SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 350W (RADEON 9600SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.5+25% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9800 SE launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the RADEON 9600SE launched at $65 and now averages $65. The RADEON 9800 SE costs 53.8% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.8 (RADEON 9800 SE) vs 0.4 (RADEON 9600SE) — the RADEON 9800 SE offers 100% better value.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 SE | RADEON 9600SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $65 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-54% | $65 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8+100% | 0.4 |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Strix Halo |
| Release | January 6 2025 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #98 | #98 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















