Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
VS
GeForce GTX 460 v2

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs GeForce GTX 460 v2

AMD

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

2022Boost: 2200 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 v2

2011Core: 779 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is significantly newer (2022 vs 2011). The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000).

InsightRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)GeForce GTX 460 v2
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
RDNA 2 (2022−2023) (6nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 460 v2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and GeForce GTX 460 v2

AMD

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 26 2022. It features the RDNA 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 v2

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 779 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,016 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) scores 2,000 and the GeForce GTX 460 v2 reaches 2,016 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is built on RDNA 2 while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 v2).

FeatureRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)GeForce GTX 460 v2
G3D Mark Score
2,000
2,016
Architecture
RDNA 2
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
6 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
128
336+163%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)GeForce GTX 460 v2
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 460 v2 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)GeForce GTX 460 v2
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
1 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 460 v2's 160W — a 165.7% difference. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)GeForce GTX 460 v2
TDP
15W-91%
160W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
450W
Power Connector
Integrated
2x 6-pin
Length
210mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
133.3+958%
12.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 launched at $199 and now averages $50. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs 40.3 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) — the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)GeForce GTX 460 v2
MSRP
$0-100%
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$50
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
40.3
Codename
Raphael
GF114
Release
September 26 2022
September 24 2011
Ranking
#729
#679