Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
VS
Iris Pro Graphics 580

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

AMD

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

2022Boost: 2200 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 580

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 580.

InsightRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)Iris Pro Graphics 580
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Longevity
RDNA 2 (2022−2023) (6nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Iris Pro Graphics 580

AMD

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 26 2022. It features the RDNA 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 580

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) scores 2,000 and the Iris Pro Graphics 580 reaches 1,985 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is built on RDNA 2 while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 128 (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)Iris Pro Graphics 580
G3D Mark Score
2,000
1,985
Architecture
RDNA 2
Generation 9.0
Process Node
6 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
128
576+350%
Boost Clock
2200 MHz+132%
950 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)Iris Pro Graphics 580
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)Iris Pro Graphics 580
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) draws 15W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 580's 45W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)Iris Pro Graphics 580
TDP
15W-67%
45W
Recommended PSU
1W
0W-100%
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
133.3+202%
44.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) — the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers NaN% better value. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)Iris Pro Graphics 580
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Raphael
Skylake GT4e
Release
September 26 2022
September 1 2015
Ranking
#729
#707