
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs Radeon R9 M385X

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M385X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M385X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M385X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M385X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and Radeon R9 M385X

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 26 2022. It features the RDNA 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

Radeon R9 M385X
The Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,994 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) scores 2,000 and the Radeon R9 M385X reaches 1,994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is built on RDNA 2 while the Radeon R9 M385X uses GCN 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 128 (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385X). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,000 | 1,994 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 128 | 896+600% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+100% | 1100 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M385X has 512 MB. The Radeon R9 M385X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M385X's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385X). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 133.3+401% | 26.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R9 M385X launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) costs 100+% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) vs 6.6 (Radeon R9 M385X) — the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) | Radeon R9 M385X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 6.6 |
| Codename | Raphael | Strato |
| Release | September 26 2022 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #729 | #681 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















