Iris Pro Graphics 580
VS
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 580

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

2022Boost: 2200 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 580.

InsightIris Pro Graphics 580Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%)
Leading raw performance (+0.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
RDNA 2 (2022−2023) (6nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 580

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.

AMD

Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 26 2022. It features the RDNA 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 scores 1,985 and the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) reaches 2,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) uses RDNA 2, both on 14 nm+ vs 6 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 128 (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 580Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
G3D Mark Score
1,985
2,000
Architecture
Generation 9.0
RDNA 2
Process Node
14 nm+
6 nm
Shading Units
576+350%
128
Boost Clock
950 MHz
2200 MHz+132%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 580Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 580Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
Shared
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
System
System
Bus Width
System
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 draws 45W versus the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)'s 15W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 1W (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 580Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
TDP
45W
15W-67%
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
1W
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
44.1
133.3+202%
💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs Infinity (Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)) — the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) offers NaN% better value. The Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).

FeatureIris Pro Graphics 580Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
Skylake GT4e
Raphael
Release
September 1 2015
September 26 2022
Ranking
#707
#729