
Iris Pro Graphics 580

Quadro 5000
Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro 5000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro 5000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro 5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Pro Graphics 580
2015Why buy it
- β Draws 45W instead of 152W, a 107W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 9.0 (2015β2016) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quadro 5000
2011Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).
- β Iris Pro Graphics 580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro 5000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- β2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β237.8% higher power demand at 152W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro 5000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Pro Graphics 580
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.

Quadro 5000
The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 scores 1,985 and the Quadro 5000 reaches 1,963 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Quadro 5000 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 352 (Quadro 5000). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,985+1% | 1,963 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 576+64% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.094 TFLOPS+51% | 0.7223 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 9 | 40+344% |
| TMUs | 72+64% | 44 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5000 carries 3 GB. Quadro 5000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics 580 and 64-bit on the Quadro 5000.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 draws 45W versus the Quadro 5000's 152W β a 108.6% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 350W (Quadro 5000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-70% | 152W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 44.1+242% | 12.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics 580 came in at $0, while the Quadro 5000 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 580 was 100+% cheaper ($2499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 0.8 (Quadro 5000) β the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Iris Pro Graphics 580 (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.8 |
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | GF100 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | February 23 2011 |
| Ranking | #707 | #687 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















