GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 765M

75

2,014

+1.5%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 980

GeForce GTX 1080

TITAN V

Iris Pro Graphics 580

45

1,985

0.0%

Arc A530M

Arc A770M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 765M is positioned at rank #109 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 765M

#99

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

270%

#101

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

244%

#102

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

244%

#106

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

222%

#107

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

220%

#109

GeForce GTX 765M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#110

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

100%

#114

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

MSRP: $179|Avg: $40

97%

#116

GeForce GTX 880M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

95%

#117

GeForce MX570

MSRP: $150|Avg: $120

95%

#118

Radeon RX 6500

MSRP: $199|Avg: $150

95%

#119

GeForce 825M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

94%

#121

Radeon HD 6970M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $48

94%

#123

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 765M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Pro Graphics 580.

Insight	GeForce GTX 765M	Iris Pro Graphics 580
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 765M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 765M Benchmark Check

Iris Pro Graphics 580 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 765M and Iris Pro Graphics 580

GeForce GTX 765M

The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.

Iris Pro Graphics 580

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 765M scores 2,014 and the Iris Pro Graphics 580 reaches 1,985 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M is built on Kepler while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Raw compute: 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Boost clocks: 863 MHz vs 950 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Iris Pro Graphics 580
G3D Mark Score	2,014+1%	1,985
Architecture	Kepler	Generation 9.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm+
Shading Units	768+33%	576
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.326 TFLOPS+21%	1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	863 MHz	950 MHz+10%
ROPs	16+78%	9
TMUs	64	72+13%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Iris Pro Graphics 580
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 765M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 765M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Iris Pro Graphics 580
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	80 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Iris Pro Graphics 580
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 765M) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 765M) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Pro Graphics 580).

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M	Iris Pro Graphics 580
Encoder	1st Gen NVENC	Quick Sync Video
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)	Quick Sync Video
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 765M draws 75W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 580's 45W — a 50% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M) vs 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.