GeForce GTX 670MX
VS
Iris Pro Graphics 580

GeForce GTX 670MX vs Iris Pro Graphics 580

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670MX

2012Core: 600 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 580

2015Core: 350 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 670MX is positioned at rank #111 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 670MX

#101
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
274%
#103
249%
#104
248%
#108
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
226%
#109
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
224%
#111
GeForce GTX 670MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#114
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
MSRP: $179|Avg: $40
99%
#116
GeForce GTX 880M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
97%
#117
GeForce MX570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $120
97%
#118
Radeon RX 6500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
97%
#119
GeForce 825M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
96%
#121
Radeon HD 6970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $48
96%
#123
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#126
GeForce GT 550M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 670MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 670MXIris Pro Graphics 580
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Pro Graphics 580 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 670MX and Iris Pro Graphics 580

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670MX

The GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,978 points.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 580

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670MX scores 1,978 and the Iris Pro Graphics 580 reaches 1,985 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670MX is built on Kepler while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses Generation 9.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 580).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MXIris Pro Graphics 580
G3D Mark Score
1,978
1,985
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 9.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
960+67%
576
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.154 TFLOPS+5%
1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs
24+167%
9
TMUs
80+11%
72

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MXIris Pro Graphics 580
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 670MX comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 670MX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MXIris Pro Graphics 580
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MXIris Pro Graphics 580
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.2
4.6+10%
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs Quick Sync Video (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs Quick Sync Video. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 (Iris Pro Graphics 580).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MXIris Pro Graphics 580
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
Quick Sync Video
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
Quick Sync Video
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670MX draws 75W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 580's 45W — a 50% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MXIris Pro Graphics 580
TDP
75W
45W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
0W-100%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80-6%
Perf/Watt
26.4
44.1+67%
💰

Value Analysis

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MXIris Pro Graphics 580
MSRP
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0
Codename
GK104
Skylake GT4e
Release
October 1 2012
September 1 2015
Ranking
#684
#707