
GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R9 350

GeForce GTX 670MX
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 670MX is positioned at rank #111 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 670MX
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 670MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 350 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 670MX and Radeon R9 350

GeForce GTX 670MX
The GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,978 points.

Radeon R9 350
The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 670MX scores 1,978 and the Radeon R9 350 reaches 1,998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670MX is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 350 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 350). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,978 | 1,998+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 | 2560+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.154 TFLOPS | 5.12 TFLOPS+344% |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 640 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 670MX comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 350 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 670MX offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 350) — the Radeon R9 350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 670MX draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 350's 300W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 670MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 300W (Radeon R9 350). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-75% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4+294% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 350 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | GK104 | Grenada |
| Release | October 1 2012 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #684 | #296 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















