
GeForce GTX 670MX

Radeon R9 350
GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R9 350 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R9 350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R9 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 670MX
2012Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon R9 350
2015Why buy it
- ✅70.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 670MX vs Radeon R9 350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 670MX
The GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,978 points.

Radeon R9 350
The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 670MX scores 1,978 and the Radeon R9 350 reaches 1,998 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670MX is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 350 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 350). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,978 | 1,998+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 960 | 2560+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.154 TFLOPS | 5.12 TFLOPS+344% |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 80 | 160+100% |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 640 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 670MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 670MX has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 350 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 670MX gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 670MX and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 350. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 350) — the Radeon R9 350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 670MX draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 350's 300W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 670MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 300W (Radeon R9 350). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-75% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4+294% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R9 350 (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Codename | GK104 | Grenada |
| Release | October 1 2012 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #684 | #296 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















