CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 670MX
Popular choices:
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 670MX is positioned at rank #111 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 670MX
Performance Per Dollar Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is significantly newer (2020 vs 2012). The Iris Xe Graphics MAX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 670MX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 670MX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (3 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Xe Graphics MAX.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 670MX | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 670MX remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 670MX and Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GeForce GTX 670MX
The GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,978 points.
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 670MX scores 1,978 and the Iris Xe Graphics MAX reaches 1,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670MX is built on Kepler while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX uses Generation 12.1, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 768 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe Graphics MAX).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,978 | 1,972 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+25% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.154 TFLOPS | 2.534 TFLOPS+120% |
| ROPs | 24 | 24 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 670MX comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics MAX has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 670MX offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+20% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics MAX).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 670MX draws 75W versus the Iris Xe Graphics MAX's 25W — a 100% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics MAX). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 25W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 26.4 | 78.9+199% |
Value Analysis
The Iris Xe Graphics MAX is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 670MX | Iris Xe Graphics MAX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $55 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | GK104 | DG1 |
| Release | October 1 2012 | October 31 2020 |
| Ranking | #684 | #685 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 670MX and Iris Xe Graphics MAX
