GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce GTX 765M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce GTX 765M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce GTX 765M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 670MX

2012

Why buy it

✅7.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 765M

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 670MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 670MX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 765M instead at 2,014 vs 1,978, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 670MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 765M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 765M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 670MX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce GTX 765M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 670MX

The GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,978 points.

GeForce GTX 765M

The GeForce GTX 765M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 863 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,014 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670MX scores 1,978 and the GeForce GTX 765M reaches 2,014 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670MX is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 765M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 765M). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 1.326 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 765M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX	GeForce GTX 765M
G3D Mark Score	1,978	2,014+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	960+25%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.154 TFLOPS	1.326 TFLOPS+15%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	80+25%	64
L1 Cache	80 KB+25%	64 KB
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX	GeForce GTX 765M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 670MX has 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 765M carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 670MX gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 670MX and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 765M. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTX 765M) — the GeForce GTX 670MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX	GeForce GTX 765M
VRAM Capacity	3 GB+50%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	80 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB+50%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 765M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX	GeForce GTX 765M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.2	4.6+10%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 765M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 765M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX	GeForce GTX 765M
Encoder	NVENC 1st Gen	1st Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670MX draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 765M's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 765M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 765M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.