GeForce GTX 670MX vs Quadro 5000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 670MX vs Quadro 5000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 670MX vs Quadro 5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 670MX

2012

Why buy it

✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 3 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 152W, a 77W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 5000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Quadro 5000

2011

Why buy it

✅20.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌102.7% higher power demand at 152W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 5000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 20.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 670MX instead at 1,978 vs 1,963, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 670MX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 5000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro 5000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 670MX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 670MX vs Quadro 5000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 670MX

The GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,978 points.

Quadro 5000

The Quadro 5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 23 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 513 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 152W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,963 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670MX scores 1,978 and the Quadro 5000 reaches 1,963 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670MX is built on Kepler while the Quadro 5000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 352 (Quadro 5000). Raw compute: 1.154 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 0.7223 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX	Quadro 5000
G3D Mark Score	1,978	1,963
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	960+173%	352
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.154 TFLOPS+60%	0.7223 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	40+67%
TMUs	80+82%	44
L1 Cache	80 KB	704 KB+780%
L2 Cache	384 KB	640 KB+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 670MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 5000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX	Quadro 5000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 670MX has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5000 carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 670MX gives you 20% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 670MX and 64-bit on the Quadro 5000. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 640 KB (Quadro 5000) — the Quadro 5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX	Quadro 5000
VRAM Capacity	3 GB+20%	2.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	384 KB	640 KB+67%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670MX draws 75W versus the Quadro 5000's 152W — a 67.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 670MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670MX) vs 350W (Quadro 5000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX	Quadro 5000
TDP	75W-51%	152W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	26.4+105%	12.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 670MX (2012 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 670MX	Quadro 5000
MSRP	—	$2499
Codename	GK104	GF100
Release	October 1 2012	February 23 2011
Ranking	#684	#687

Search GeForce GTX 670MX on Amazon

Search Quadro 5000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.