
Iris Pro Graphics 580

Radeon R9 350
Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R9 350 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R9 350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R9 350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Iris Pro Graphics 580
2015Why buy it
- β Draws 45W instead of 300W, a 255W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2015 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Radeon R9 350
2015Why buy it
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- β Iris Pro Graphics 580 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 350 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- β2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β566.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Radeon R9 350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Iris Pro Graphics 580
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,985 points.

Radeon R9 350
The Radeon R9 350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,998 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 scores 1,985 and the Radeon R9 350 reaches 1,998 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon R9 350 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 576 (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 350). Raw compute: 1.094 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 5.12 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 350). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,985 | 1,998 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 576 | 2560+344% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.094 TFLOPS | 5.12 TFLOPS+368% |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1000 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 9 | 64+611% |
| TMUs | 72 | 160+122% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 350 carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 350 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Iris Pro Graphics 580 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 350.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 350). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 350). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP8,VP9 | β |
Power & Dimensions
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 draws 45W versus the Radeon R9 350's 300W β a 147.8% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 300W (Radeon R9 350). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-85% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 44.1+558% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Iris Pro Graphics 580 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 350 launched at $99. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 580 was 100+% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Iris Pro Graphics 580) vs 20.2 (Radeon R9 350) β the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Radeon R9 350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 20.2 |
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | Grenada |
| Release | September 1 2015 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #707 | #296 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















